Showing posts tagged feminisms
(Reblogged from apiphile)

craw101:

geeknip:

professorfangirl:

blackmorgan:

Just leaving this here…

Daniel Craig, 007 cross dresses to support equality (by RTAmerica)

professorfangirl:

Holy fuck. I was going to make a quip about how much he looks like J.K. Rowling, but then the tears at the end happened, and my heart made a very uncomfortable kinda sideways lurch in my chest…

OH MY GODDDDD. I already love Dame Judi Dench but this solidifies Daniel Craig as a fantastic human being in my mind (I already liked him for arguing with the writers of Casino Royale that Vesper should be clothed when in her fetal position in the shower after seeing her first violent death, rather than in some state of “sexy” undress.)

1. This video is wonderful.

2. I didn’t know that about Daniel and that shower scene! That information made me happier than this video, quite honestly. Keep being wonderful, Daniel Craig.

Always reblog.

(Reblogged from apiphile)
(Reblogged from idwellinpossibility)
(Reblogged from fannyhams)

apocalypse-me0w:

My university’s consent campaign

(Reblogged from fannyhams)

vvtvrmom:

I just looked outside to check the patriarchy and apparently it’s reigning men

(Source: princecryingto)

(Reblogged from fannyhams)

beeftony:

This comic accurately sums up my feelings towards those who complain about The Hawkeye Initiative.

(Reblogged from betterthandarkchocolate)
A happiness profile would be the profile of the kind of person who is most likely to be happy, as we can also see in the following classic description: “happy persons are more likely to be found in the economically prosperous countries, whose freedom and democracy are held in respect and the political scene is stable. The happy are more likely to be found in majority groups than among minorities and more often at the top of the ladder than at the bottom. They are typically married and get on well with families and friends. In respect of their personal characteristics, the happy appear relatively healthy, both physically and mentally. They are active and open-minded. They feel they are in control of their lives. Their aspirations concern social and moral matters rather than money making. In matters of politics, the happy tend to the conservative side of middle. (Veenhoven 1991: 16)” The face of happiness, at least in this description, looks rather like the face of privilege. Rather than assuming happiness is simply found in “happy persons,” we can consider how claims to happiness make certain forms of personhood valuable. Attributions of happiness might be how social norms and ideals become affective, as if relative proximity to these norms and ideals creates happiness.

Sara Ahmed, The Promise of Happiness

Highly recommended

(via gole-yas)

Always interesting to read Sara Ahmed’s thoughts. Her work on postcolonialism and feminist theory invoke important critical thinking on both subjects. What’s even more interesting is how Sara - half Pakistani, half English - discusses ingenuity and scholarship in terms of feminism, racism and queer studies. “Embodied Others in Post-Coloniality” by her is an essential read. I’d love to take her interview soon.

(via mehreenkasana)

(Reblogged from mindovermatterzine)

kissingunderspiderwebs:

jakface:

I’ve seen my share of “fake geek girl” shaming, and just thought having a Fairy Gamer Momma to come to the rescue would be nice. I know they exist, I’ve met plenty who are amazing and could beat my ass at any version of Mario Kart. Give the Gamer Momma in your life a big hug! :D

ugh…if only this didn’t include threats and physical bullying (assault).

(Reblogged from kissingunderspiderwebs)

thisisthinprivilege:

Anita Sarkeesian at TEDxWomen 2012 (by TEDxTalks)

I’m sharing this because This is Thin Privilege has also been attacked by waves of trolls (or what I call trollwaves) who coordinate on Reddit threads and 4chan forums (the largely unmoderated fora she talks about in the video).

Tumblr is a great space for activism because it allows me to deal with trolls on several different levels of moderation and blocking. I suggest checking out my block/report list for users you should block/report if you plan on reading the notes of the posts from This is Thin Privilege. 

The kinds of comments I get — mostly Disqus that never see the light of day, though also in the reblogs — have likened me to both Hitler and Stalin, suggested that I need to be shot multiple times, said that I’m a terrible example to young girls and that people like me are destroying the planet by virtue of our existence. I get 10 comments like this a day, more when a post from This is Thin Privilege is picked up by a Reddit thread, on 4chan, or skinnygossip.  Just like my hobby of sorts is activism, the hobby of these people is hating other people online. They encourage and cookie each other, just as it’s described in the video, with social merit badges for particularly heinous comments, especially if those comments get the right kind of play (which is why we say not to feed the trolls). 

But these hate campaigns don’t always have a sad ending. Sarkeesian raised 5x what she set out for in her Kickstarter, largely due to the visibility she garnered being the center of such a large attack. No one should have to go through what she went through, but I’m very glad she capitalized on it.

(Reblogged from maggiemunkee)

stfusexists:

faineemae:

queenofadodi:

Men had no problem violating women’s bodies while they had on corsets, petticoats and farthingales, so what the fuck makes you think a short skirt has anything to do with it? 

Men also have no problem violating women’s bodies while they wear a niqab, hijab and burqa, some of the most covered form of clothing. So basically, what the fuck makes you think clothes have anything to do with it?

Super relevant. 

(Source: morenamagia)

(Reblogged from maggiemunkee)
The “fat girls give better head” stereotype is of course fatphobic but is also inherently slut-shaming because it’s representing being proficient at a sex act as something negative. And in a lot of people’s minds, being good at sex means you’ve had more, which equals slut/whore for women. It’s tied in to the stereotype of fat girls as “easy” (aka slutty) because they have low self-esteem, and not because they simply love sex. When you’re a fat girl you’re not allowed to have a lot of sex unless you’re desperately searching for attention. The sex-loving, confident fat girl is in this case invisible. Our sexuality is always complicated by the difference between our view of our own sexuality and society’s view of what fat sexuality should look like. Meaning, it should be either kept completely behind closed doors or fit within the framework of self-loathing and body hate that all fat women are expected to experience on a daily basis. This is why cultivating a sex-positive culture is necessarily important to fat/body acceptance, and why we have to make fat visible in sex-positive movements and spaces.

Tasha Fierce, Sex and the Fat Girl (via megaera)

oh right I wrote this

(via tashafierce)

(Reblogged from redefiningbodyimage)

coolchicksfromhistory:

Ada Blackjack aboard her rescue ship, 1923.

In 1921, 23 year old Alaska Native Ada Blackjack joined an expedition to Wrangel Island north of Siberia as a cook and seamstress.  Ada and four men chosen for their expertise in science and geography survived on the island for over a year before rations ran out.  At that point, three men tried to cross the frozen Chukchi Sea for food while Ada and Lorne Knight, an ailing member of the group, stayed behind.  Lorne died in April 1923.  Ada was rescued in August 1923.  The three men who left to seek help were never heard from again.  Ada lived to age 85, living a quiet life and raising two sons.

The photo above was found on Jennifer Niven’s webpage.  She is the author of Ada BlackJack: A True Story of Survival in the Arctic, the digital edition of which is current $3.03 on Amazon.

(Reblogged from sinidentidades)
(Reblogged from maggiemunkee)