foolish mistakes, but whatever, they are all mine.
Mostly-cis, fat ,middle aged, bisexual, disabled, white femme. My hobby is seeing how many years I can add to my collection before I die.

Posting will be random but may contain fat acceptance, wool, and cats, lagomorphs and corvids in no particular order. Posting may also be sporadic as I have ME/CFS and a bunch of other stuff that makes me tired and some times crabby.

All worked by me is under the license below unless otherwise stated. Photos, quotes and work by other people are under license by their creator. If you see your work here and would like it removed from my blog, please contact me.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 UK: England & Wales License

This blog is not suitable for those under the age of 18 as it discusses and shows depictions of sex, sexuality and other adult themes

 

And one thing I do know about UKIP support is that a *lot* of it is based on a perception that there is a sneering, metropolitan pseudo-liberal elite that dominates the discourse in this country, and that mocks the concerns of ordinary people. That perception, more than anything else, is what drives the party’s support.

I think, though I could be wrong, that the sharing on social media of “memes” poking fun at their posters and taking as read that the people who see them are in agreement both that UKIP’s values are wrong and that anyone who supports them must be a bad and stupid person is *PRECISELY* the sort of thing that encourages people to turn to them. You’re doing their recruiting job for them.

I think, really, I’ve had about as easy and straightforward an immigration process as it is possible to have in the UK. And it’s still been arduous, disempowering, expensive, humiliating, complicated, and it’s left me with something that…well, I don’t know what it is and am loathe to self-diagnose, but it feels a bit like PTSD sounds… whenever I hear almost anything about immigration.

I’m just so frustrated that I never, or hardly ever, hear perspectives like mine. I know part of this is due to — irony of ironies — how small a percent of the population immigrants are. But a lot of ground has been ceded to the tabloids and UKIP and stuff. There’s hardly anyone pro-immigration in public life.

These days we start from the pervasive and unacknowledged assumption that immigrants are a drain on society and trying to overrun the country because everybody wants to live in the UK, and carry on from there. Hardly anyone ever questions that. It seems almost like people assume that immigrants can’t see/read what’s being said about us. I remember thinking this once when I was half-listening to a Lib Dem (I think an MP? I can’t remember who) give a speech, and said something about “jobs for British workers” which just made me roll my eyes. A little part of me wanted to shout “I’m right fucking here, you know! I can hear you!” I read about immigration caps it sounds like I’m supposed to be happy about (same as, a couple of years ago, I was supposed to be sad about house prices falling, because the news was for homeowners and not for people like me who might like to buy a house one day before I’d saved up more than a year’s wages as a deposit), when actually my heart sinks to read stuff like the immigration minister saying “We are by improving the selectivity of our immigration system and increasing enforcement activity.”

(trigger warning: discussion of domestic violence) Recently, Charles Saatchi was photographed assaulting his wife, Nigella Lawson, at Scott’s Restaurant. He is shown grabbing her by the throat – he has now accepted a police caution, so there’s no need to caveat this with “allegedly” or the like.

The media furore has quickly turned not to the events in the restaurant, nor the issue of domestic violence, but predictably and boringly to the reaction of high-profile figures to the story. And one of those figures is the Deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg. Nick was asked on his call-in show what he would have done if he had witnessed the assault, and gave a reply which has been criticised as stumbling and insufficiently condemnatory. He’s been pressured to issue a statement clarifying his views.

What’s interesting about the statement is that it doesn’t actually answer the question he was asked in the interview, which is what he would have done if he’d witnessed the assault. His stumbling answer was trying to honestly answer the question. And the honest answer is that most people witnessing that assault would have done nothing – particularly if it was over before people had time to react. As the lovely Jennie points out, the bystander effect means that attacks in large crowds are surprisingly rarely challenged, and it’s hard to condemn the witnesses of an event you didn’t see for acting naturally.

mindovermatterzine:

[Image: ATOS logo superimposed over Dr. Nick, the quack doctor from the Simpsons, with a speech bubble saying ‘Time for your assessment!’]

The image above is our entry in the ATOS logo redesign competition. If you haven’t heard of ATOS, they are a French company which was contracted by the government to carry out assessments of disabled people to determine whether they qualify for Employment and Support Allowance (which replaces the old Disability Benefit). This is part of a general shift towards contracting out government services to private companies because it’s apparently ‘more efficient’. But it turns out that, shock! horror! ATOS hasn’t been doing such a good job at assessing whether people are fit for work. In fact they’ve done such a bad job at it that lots of people went online to compain about the way they were being treated. In a situation like this any responsible company would take the criticism seriously and attempt to open up a dialogue with disabled folks in order to address their concerns. That’s not what happened. Instead ATOS sent threatening letters to the Internet Service Providers that hosted the websites, and the ISPs shut the websites down.
The websites that were shut down did not contain any illegal content. In fact they were engaging in exactly the kind of free speech and debate that is necessary for a functioning democracy. However libel lawsuits are so costly that only the rich can afford to defend a libel lawsuit in court. Ordinary people simply do not have the money to hire a lawyer to defend a libel suit, even if the suit is blatantly unfounded, and so even the threat of a lawsuit is enough to get a website shut down.
However the Internet is fighting back. ATOS wants to silence legitimate criticism of them, but disabled people, activists, and bloggers are responding by turning the criticism up several notches. If you’re artistically inclined, or just like playing with Photoshop or the GIMP, why not join in the fun create your own redesigned ATOS logo? Here’s the original logo to start with.


I received the assessment forms in the post this morning. So that’s made me feel better then.

mindovermatterzine:

[Image: ATOS logo superimposed over Dr. Nick, the quack doctor from the Simpsons, with a speech bubble saying ‘Time for your assessment!’]

The image above is our entry in the ATOS logo redesign competition. If you haven’t heard of ATOS, they are a French company which was contracted by the government to carry out assessments of disabled people to determine whether they qualify for Employment and Support Allowance (which replaces the old Disability Benefit). This is part of a general shift towards contracting out government services to private companies because it’s apparently ‘more efficient’. But it turns out that, shock! horror! ATOS hasn’t been doing such a good job at assessing whether people are fit for work. In fact they’ve done such a bad job at it that lots of people went online to compain about the way they were being treated. In a situation like this any responsible company would take the criticism seriously and attempt to open up a dialogue with disabled folks in order to address their concerns. That’s not what happened. Instead ATOS sent threatening letters to the Internet Service Providers that hosted the websites, and the ISPs shut the websites down.

The websites that were shut down did not contain any illegal content. In fact they were engaging in exactly the kind of free speech and debate that is necessary for a functioning democracy. However libel lawsuits are so costly that only the rich can afford to defend a libel lawsuit in court. Ordinary people simply do not have the money to hire a lawyer to defend a libel suit, even if the suit is blatantly unfounded, and so even the threat of a lawsuit is enough to get a website shut down.

However the Internet is fighting back. ATOS wants to silence legitimate criticism of them, but disabled people, activists, and bloggers are responding by turning the criticism up several notches. If you’re artistically inclined, or just like playing with Photoshop or the GIMP, why not join in the fun create your own redesigned ATOS logo? Here’s the original logo to start with.

I received the assessment forms in the post this morning. So that’s made me feel better then.

BiMedia | Bisexual News & Opinion from BiMedia.org

BCN magazine editor Jen Yockney was among the guests at last night’s LGBT garden party hosted by David Cameron at 10 Downing Street.

One of my personal heroes, btw.

New fund announced to help disabled people into politics | eGov monitor | The Information Daily

Equalities Minister Lynne Featherstone said that the fund represents “an important step towards levelling the playing field” with giving disabled people more of a voice in politics.

The money will be available until March 2014, and will help meet the costs that a disabled candidate might face when standing for election. The funding will help with transport, technology, and communication support

Copyright wars heat up: US wins extradition of college kid from England

jhnbrssndn:

A 23-year old student from Sheffield Hallam University in the north of England is bound for America. That wouldn’t be unusual—except that Richard O’Dwyer won’t go voluntarily. The UK Home Secretary has today agreed to extradite O’Dwyer over US copyright infringement charges for running a “linking site” called TVShack.

Back in June 2010, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) seized O’Dwyer’s tvshack.net domain name after a closed, one-sided hearing before a judge. (All domains ending in .net and .com are seizable by US law enforcement, regardless of where their owners are located.) But O’Dwyer soon had the site back up at a new address, TVShack.cc, which did not require a US-based domain name registrar. He slapped a notice to the top of the new site urging users to update their bookmarks.

In November 2010, British police showed up at O’Dwyer’s home. As Julia O’Dwyer, Richard’s mother, told us last year, “They had two American guys with them, which Richard assumes were men from ICE. They questioned him about his website. It wasn’t more than an hour. The ICE men shook his hand when they left,” she said. “One of them said ‘Don’t worry, you won’t have to go to America.’”

Richard, apparently realizing that his site had become a serious matter, took it down. A couple of computers were seized, and he hoped that would be the end of the matter.

It wasn’t. He was asked to report to his local police station on May 23, 2011, where he found out what had happened: UK police had dropped their own investigation, but the US had requested O’Dwyer’s extradition.

Such remedies are uncommon among all offenses; they are doubly so when it comes to copyright and computer cases. Such extraditions were nearly unheard of until the last year, when O’Dwyer and then Megaupload’s Kim Dotcom both became extradition targets over copyright cases.

O’Dwyer’s site was a “linking site” that did not host infringing content itself, and his lawyer compared it to Google, which also links to copyrighted content. TVshack did do things like show lists of the most clicked-on links (surprise: most were copyrighted TV shows), however, and the proportion of offending links appears to be much higher than at a search engine like Google. US lawyers argued that O’Dwyer had personally promoted links to infringing content, too.

Nexus

O’Dwyer’s site did not appear to violate UK law, and O’Dwyer’s servers weren’t located in the US. This alone poses no problem to an extradition claim; courts have recognized for centuries that a person can’t simply sit in another jurisdiction and direct a harm into another jurisdiction without penalty. But the general question raised in such cases is whether the alleged miscreant had a “nexus” with the target jurisdiction; had he put himself under its rule by choosing to transact business there? Or was the contact merely incidental and accidental?

A UK judge recently found a nexus. “There are said to be direct consequences of criminal activity by Richard O’Dwyer in the USA albeit by him never leaving the north of England. Such a state of affairs does not demand a trial here if the competent UK authorities decline to act and does, in my judgment, permit one in the USA,” he ruled two months ago. (Julia O’Dwyer said that the judge lacked the “technical brains to know about the whole thing. That guy just lives and breathes extradition.”)

But the final decision to proceed would be up to the Home Secretary, Theresa May. According a BBC “breaking news” tweet this morning, May has agreed to O’Dwyer’s extradition despite a 20,000-person strong petition urging her to refuse consent.

Equal Marriage in the UK - It’s about time!

From the 'It's About Time' website.

"It’s about time we had equal marriage in the UK, and we’re one step closer – but we need your help to achieve equality.

The Government have promised equal civil marriage by 2015 at the latest. They are holding a consultation on how this should be done, and you can respond and encourage them to go further – to implement fully equal marriage and civil partnerships for all couples, both religious and secular.

No matter what your politics, we need as many people as possible to respond. We need to send a big message that we want full marriage equality.

Please take part in this next step in the fight for equality. Please tell your family and your friends to get involved too – this is a huge step forward, and everybody can play their part in making history.”